At 2010-05-05 08:55, Pieren wrote: >...Let say that 99.99% of the unclassified and residential roads can be >walked on both sides, why should we draw the sidewalks everywhere ? It >would be more clever to tag where sidewalks are missing or not allowed, >imo. Say where things are missing, not where they are obviously >authorized. Or you add "oneway=no" to all roads as well ?
+1. Micromapping may be "on the rise", but that doesn't mean it's necessarily a good thing. I'd still like to see a means of specifying, on administrative boundaries, tags that are to be assumed (inherited) by contained objects (e.g. sidewalk=yes, surface=paved, lanes=2, maxspeed=25 mph, etc.). I currently don't tag these, but it would be useful to visitors to know them. -- Alan Mintz <alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net> _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
