2010/8/24 Peter Körner <osm-li...@mazdermind.de>: > Am 24.08.2010 13:38, schrieb Elena of Valhalla: >> >> On 8/24/10, Peter Körner<osm-li...@mazdermind.de> wrote: >>> >>> Am 24.08.2010 12:17, schrieb Liz: >>>> >>>> the butcher and baker are working with raw materials, producing >>>> something >>>> temporary and not required to have beauty in its form >>> >>> What, there is no beauty in my rump steak? I cant accept that, it's not >>> true!!!1eleven11! ;) >> >> you're kidding, but what about a (real) sushi chef who produces >> something temporary, but is also required to give extreme care to the >> estetics of the dish? >> > > I think we should stick with the general classification "a sushi restaurant" > and ignore the specialty "a specific sushi chef" when dealing with tagging. > As Emilie Laffray said, beauty is in the eye of the beholder and so it can't > be part of our definition for craft=. > > I'd like Élisée Reclus proposal better: if it sells something to end > customers is a shop and not a craft.
A sculptor (and an art gallery, often) ultimately hopes to sell his artwork. By that criterion, nothing would be cratfsmanship. > Peter Ciao, Simone _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
