Hello list, while wondering about street-related things with other folks on #osm...@oftc, we came to the question: why is Relation:associatedStreet needed at all? (Karlsruhe schema)
I've always used it to associate housenumbers to the given street (I found a relation more error-proof than addr:street), but then we thought then no new type of relation is needed for this ([0] and [1], for example). [0]: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Street [1]: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Collected_Ways In fact, we already have a relation for grouping a street together (various segments + "links"). That's Relation:route, with route=road. What about a "house" role to include housenumbers there? I already did a couple of those (don't know whether Mapnik renders them, but who cares -- and they're really 2-3 cases), but I'm seeking for some kind of discussion (maybe a consensus?) before making a more formal proposal. Ideas? Kindly, David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
