On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 05:09:22 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:00 AM, David Paleino > <da...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:42:12 +0200, Simone Saviolo wrote: > > > >> 2010/9/1 David Paleino <da...@debian.org>: > >> > In fact, we already have a relation for grouping a street together > >> > (various segments + "links"). That's Relation:route, with route=road. > >> > What about a "house" role to include housenumbers there? > >> > >> I'm not sure if you're suggesting we use the proposed relation Street > >> (that already has a "house" role) or the approved relation Route. > > > > I'm proposing the use of the already well-established Route. > > Why is a route relation needed to group the segments of a street?
Would you mind forking a new thread next time? :-) However, I'm using that because I consider "Foo Avenue" as a logical unit, a "route", even if the way is split (because of oneways, different classifications, different tags, whatever). David -- . ''`. Debian developer | http://wiki.debian.org/DavidPaleino : :' : Linuxer #334216 --|-- http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 ----|---- http://deb.li/dapal `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging