On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 13:30 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Nathan Mills <nat...@nwacg.net> wrote: > > So this is not/should not be a mini_roundabout? It seems a little silly to > > call it anything else, since the city just dug a hole in the center of the > > existing intersection, built a circular curb, and planted a tree: > > > > http://g.co/maps/e2gsv > > > > What about this one? Also a full on roundabout? > > > > http://g.co/maps/d6n74 > > > > This looks more like a roundabout to me: > > > > http://g.co/maps/hnbp9 > > All three are roundabouts, yes. All 3 are roundabouts, none of them a mini-roundabouts.
The point of a mini-roundabout is that they can be driven over, hence whilst cars are supposed to go around them and many are 'speed-hump raised' to encourage this behaviour. Trucks can pass over them as many are in places where a truck cannot get around otherwise. The first 2 should be mini-roundabouts, as a truck is likely to have serious issues with them. I cannot imagine that tree will last too long. This is a mini-roundabout, which you can see is raised slightly http://g.co/maps/hm49m Actually its part of the magic roundabout, which is a roundabout you can go around in either direction, and at each intersection there is a mini-roundabout. On osm its here, http://osm.org/go/eumbs5ZIw-- Phil > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging