Hi! Am 03.12.2012 um 20:27 schrieb Ole Nielsen <on-...@xs4all.nl>:
> I intentionally chose not to deprecate maxspeed:wet as I had the feeling that > doing so might upset some people and I didn't want such minor issues to > affect the voting process. Of course I will recommend to use the conditional > scheme and hope we can make a recommendation to deprecate the maxspeed:wet > tag if there is no strong opposition to do so. The reason why I asked was: will someone complain if I change maxspeed:wet to maxspeed:conditional when I encounter it? I don't think so but better safe than sorry and therefore I asked ;-) > BTW, I'm not sure how useful the wet tag (old style or new style) is. You > will need some damn precise and detailed weather forecasts for a route > planner to be able to use such information. And usually it is only fairly > short sections of highway having such tags so the impact is minimal (and in > my experience drivers pretty much ignore such signs anyway). I guess the best answer to this is: 640 kB ought to be enough for anybody. ;-) I completely agree with you, but who knows what some clever people invent tomorrow. As I already have the information about those signs it doesn't hurt to put it into the database. Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
