I haven't mapped it yet at a space level detail. I can't really say I like the idea of using house number as the space number for some campgrounds but not others, that's just a bad hack. I remember some space number proposal in the wiki, but it wasn't clear how it was supposed to work. On Jun 17, 2013 8:21 AM, "Tod Fitch" <t...@fitchdesign.com> wrote:
> In the case I am looking at now there is no street number for the > campground. At least there is no sign indicating one nor have I seen a > street number on an any map. So I guess that addr:housenumber might work. > But I imagine that there are campgrounds that actually have an street > number assigned to the whole complex, so overloading addr:housenumber would > not work. > > For what it is worth, the practice in the area I an interested in for > dispatching emergency services is to use the campground name and then the > written reports, if for Forest Service, use the old township and range > location. Other agencies might be using UTM grid nowadays. > > addr:unit seems like a reasonable choice for tagging the individual > campsite. In the case where the whole campground has an street address, it > seems like adding a unit number to the campground address is sufficient. > But the Forest Service campgrounds in many of the areas I visit have no > obvious street address and the service roads within the campground are > usually unnamed too. So what, if anything, should be used for the > addr:street tag? > > Any objections to using a addr:housename tag set to the campground name? > Seems like that fits Bryce's old mailman analogy as an address that might > have been deliverable. > > Paul: I assume that you've mapped your campground. Can you give me a > location to look at so I can view your tagging? Thanks! > > -Tod > > > > On Jun 17, 2013, at 12:30 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > > As someone who lives in a campground, that's a hack. My address is > similar to how most American apartment complexes or office buildings handle > addresses (house number, street, unit number). > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com>wrote: > >> A campsite number seems a direct analog to a house number. "Site 52, >> Evergreen Campground" is a form of address that in olden days a mailman >> might actually have delivered to. I don't see this as a rendering hack... >> it seems pretty clean to me. >> >> But do place the node where the little number post is: that post is what >> you're actually mapping. >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
