If you add bicycle=yes, they render differently in opencyclemap (not saying that's a good thing, just an observation). It seems to be used to imply that it's reasonably passable by bike, and nobody seems to object.
Richard On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Maarten Deen <md...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > Is there a deeper meaning of adding foot=yes or bicycle=yes to > highway=track or highway=path without adding other limitations? I thought > track and path are by default routable for foot and bicycle, so IMHO they > add nothing. > > Examples: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/**browse/way/53561813<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/53561813> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/**browse/way/68796031<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/68796031> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/**browse/way/195440134<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/195440134> > > Regards, > Maarten > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.**org/listinfo/tagging<http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
