Am 11.07.2013 22:55, schrieb Masi Master: > Am 11.07.2013, 16:06 Uhr, schrieb fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com>: > >> Am 10.07.2013 20:34, schrieb doug brown: >>> I wish to map the trails in a state park, many of which are multiple >>> use horse trails, hiking trails, and mountain biking trails. What >>> tagging scheme would be appropriate for these trails? >> >> I stopped using *ways as values and only use path with >> bicycle/foot/horse=(official/)designated/yes/no. > > I think, it is nice to see for who the trail is made for! So I would > prefer bridleway & cycleway etc. (A minor problem is the > high-ranking/strict default-value (i mean "designated"), better it is > only *=yes)
+1 You I right I missed that. Especially considering trails or pathes in the wilderness. > You propose access-tags, but i think they only should used if there is a > access-sign or symbol!? > >> everything else goes to extra tags: >> >> mtb:scale=* >> sac_scale=* >> uiaa_scale=* >> smoothness=* >> surface=* >> width=* >> barrier=* >> obstacle=* > > using extra tags is verry good! _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
