Am 11.07.2013 23:02, schrieb fly: > Am 11.07.2013 22:55, schrieb Masi Master: >> Am 11.07.2013, 16:06 Uhr, schrieb fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com>: >> >>> Am 10.07.2013 20:34, schrieb doug brown: >>>> I wish to map the trails in a state park, many of which are multiple >>>> use horse trails, hiking trails, and mountain biking trails. What >>>> tagging scheme would be appropriate for these trails? >>> >>> I stopped using *ways as values and only use path with >>> bicycle/foot/horse=(official/)designated/yes/no. >> >> I think, it is nice to see for who the trail is made for! So I would >> prefer bridleway & cycleway etc. (A minor problem is the >> high-ranking/strict default-value (i mean "designated"), better it is >> only *=yes)
You can not often tell for who the ways are mode for. Many are multiuse , some change over the seasons and it always needs on personal conditions and abilities. > +1 > You I right I missed that. Especially considering trails or pathes in > the wilderness. Sorry whole block above was the comment to sentence below !!! >> You propose access-tags, but i think they only should used if there is a >> access-sign or symbol!? >> >>> everything else goes to extra tags: >>> >>> mtb:scale=* >>> sac_scale=* >>> uiaa_scale=* >>> smoothness=* >>> surface=* >>> width=* >>> barrier=* >>> obstacle=* >> >> using extra tags is verry good! > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
