On 19 July 2013 18:42, Eugene Alvin Villar <sea...@gmail.com> wrote: > <<Forking the discussion from "Double and misfitting house numbers">> > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Not for me. I think the address is a "feature" by ifself, not an >> attribute of other features (like 'name'). >> > > I want to know what do people think about addresses. > > 1. Are addresses features as Pieren suggests? Thus addresses should be > mapped separately or at least tagged singularly on the primary object that > represents the address. > > 2. Or are addresses attributes (like names) of POIs, buildings, and the > like? In which case, it would be OK if many POIs are mapped with the same > addr:housenumbers. >
In my opinion addresses are independent map features in their own right. Please have a look at this proposal http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Provides_feature on how one can associate the same address node with multiple POIs. /Markus
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
