On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:40 PM, sabas88 <saba...@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Any reasons not to use landuse=depot? Besides the sparsity of its wiki
>> page...
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Ddepot
>> 428 instances in taginfo
> +1
> But using depot:type=* instead of type=* (as I suggested in
> http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/RFC-Classification-for-ports-and-inland-terminals-td5792661.html

Thanks all for you suggestions. "depot" is the closest for what we
need although it's not only a depot for vehicles. It's also keeping
various equipments required by municipalities (could be street
furnitures, salting of roads, plants (winter), compost, etc).

Btw, use simply "depot=*" instead of "depot:type=*". I don't
understand this recent trend to add a ":type" suffix in subtags. It
was not the case in the past (e.g. "building=*", "wood=*",
"traffic_signals=*", etc, etc, etc)

Pieren

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to