Just a quick comment: If it's not useful to use it on ways, then I don't think we should recommend it on nodes *or ways* on the wiki page (as it is currently). In fact, we should recommend against putting on ways.
2014-04-09 16:16 GMT-03:00 André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>: > On 2014-04-09 10:47, Pieren wrote : > > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:38 PM, André Pirard <a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> 1. noexit cannot be used on ways because that does not show what end >> "cannot pass" >> >> > eeh, what "what end" ? Either the highway line is linked to another > highway at both ends, then "noexit" is a tagging mistake. Or the highway > line is not linked to another highway on both ends and then the "noexit" > can be helpful (confirming tha'ts really an isolated highway and not some > connection missing) > > > ??? Let's explain in details. We let alone the Xmas trees. > Assuming real noexit, the typical > cases<http://overpass-turbo.eu/map.html?Q=%3C%21--%0AThis%20has%20been%20generated%20by%20the%20overpass-turbo%20wizard.%0AThe%20original%20search%20was%3A%0A%E2%80%9Cnoexit%3Dyes%E2%80%9D%0A--%3E%0A%3Cosm-script%20output%3D%22json%22%20timeout%3D%2225%22%3E%0A%20%20%20%20%3Cquery%20type%3D%22way%22%3E%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%3Chas-kv%20k%3D%22noexit%22%20v%3D%22yes%22%2F%3E%0A%20%20%20%20%20%20%3Cbbox-query%20s%3D%2250.66839555058174%22%20w%3D%225.717890262603759%22%20n%3D%2250.67569820203223%22%20e%3D%225.731172561645508%22%2F%3E%0A%20%20%20%20%3C%2Fquery%3E%0A%20%20%3C%21--%20print%20results%20--%3E%0A%20%20%3Cprint%20mode%3D%22body%22%2F%3E%0A%20%20%3Crecurse%20type%3D%22down%22%2F%3E%0A%20%20%3Cprint%20mode%3D%22skeleton%22%20order%3D%22quadtile%22%2F%3E%0A%3C%2Fosm-script%3E> > *look > like* two normal junctions at each way end but one of them *is in fact *a > dead end. > Why would we tag noexit on the way and request the beholder to zoom in > each end to determine which is dead if we can tag the information clearly > on the end node? What about T shaped ways where the top way contains 2 > dead ends? "gotcha, there were 2"? > Now, instead of a vertical bar, what about a small (or larger) mesh like *rue > Grétry*: are we going to tag as dead ends all the segments of the mesh up > to the normal junction even if they're not directly related with a dead > end? And, BTW, are we speaking (in Subject:) of ways or of roads? Must we > apply noexit=yes to both ways of the same road when we split one? How > would the brave contributor splitting a way cope with that if he hasn't got > the faintest notion of what noexit is (no blame on him!)? > These are [probably a part of] the questions that raise and should be > settled and that no one advocating noexit on ways mentioned. > Frankly, noexit on nodes (as designed) is much more logical and simple > (than on ways, of course). > > Cheers, > > André. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
