I guess the problem arises from tagging dead-ends in a geo database.
QA tools should keep there false positives for themself, not in OSM, don't you
think?
On 10 avril 2014 16:59:44 UTC+02:00, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Florian Schäfer
><flor...@schaeferban.de> wrote:
>
>> True, in the most cases it is not important. But sometimes it is, for
>> example in my T-deadend example, mentioned on this ML.
>> All cases can be covered by the tagging on nodes. The tagging on ways
>can't
>> cover all cases (deadends with more than one end) and causes problems
>for
>> example when splitting ways.
>
>I also explained why the mentionned examples are not a problem. I'm
>ready to change my opinion if I get valid arguments...
>
>> Therefore I'd recommend in the Wiki to use it always on nodes to
>avoid the
>> problems with way-tagging.
>
>But we don't have "problems" with the tag on the way ! It's true that
>the wiki has to document the best practices but it should not fordid
>practices that are not wrong, harmfull, unclear or ambiguous ! I
>regret the time when people worked with a more open mind in this
>project.
>
>Pieren
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
--
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
