Rather than introducing other tags, would it be better to just better
define and document what firepit should be used for?
Probably the best idea. The way I see it is that the main information
people would be interested in if they can make BBQ there (and maybe
heating). Then it would also be great to be able to combine it with
tourism=picnic_site and tourism=camp_site. Maybe the solution for that
is simply to use bbq=yes
amenity=fire_pit (we decide that it either implies bbq=yes or no and
then you can use bbq=* if it doesn't)
amenity=bbq_grill
Do we want to be able to disinguish between a fire_pit and bbq_grill
when tagging it on a tourism=camp_sit tag? Or would be bbq=yes be
enough... thinking about it now it actually sounds like "bqq allowed".
Maybe use bbq=yes/no/fire_pit/grill/forbidden/permitted/official on
those on tourism tags?
And are we actually interested in fireplace=yes? I found some
heating=fireplace wouldn't that make more sense?
__________
openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging