On 08/07/2014 14:59, Daniel Koć wrote:
This is my first attempt to define OSM features.
Currently taginfo suggests almost no usage of peak like this
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/peak#values
and see also:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/natural=peak#combinations
The "Proposed_features" page seems confused about tagging and rendering
though - given that local terrain height is available in most parts of
the world from external sources, couldn't a map that wanted to suppress
hillocks do so simply by comparing elevation with that? I'm not sure
why you'd need to tag the height of "things around thing A" on "thing A"
itself.
Also, the normal way to "define" OSM features is by going out and
mapping them - so I'd go out and do that first, rather than worry about
getting a "proposal" "accepted".
Cheers,
Andy
PS: Apologies if this comes across as overtly negative ("I wouldn't
start from here if I were you") but it's not meant to be - OSM needs
mappers far more than it needs proposal writers. If you think that it's
important to classify a natural=peak as a hillock go and have a look at
it, and if it looks like a hillock to you, tag it as one!
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
