2014-07-08 20:08 GMT+02:00 Daniel Koć <dan...@xn--ko-wla.pl>: > If I was to define peak now, I would start with "terrain=peak", and then > add "descent=natural" or "descent=artificial" to narrow it down when needed.
I agree, man_made=mound isn't a bad idea. I wouldn't question all peaks and require a subtag like descent=natural for what can and has in the past sufficiently been described with natual=peak. If there are a few mounds between the currently tagged objects, you can always retag those few, but retagging all peaks because there are some questionable ones between them is not a good idea (IMHO). In my area there are similar (?) prehistoric objects (tumuli) which have been used as tombs by the Etruscans: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerveteri#Necropolis_of_the_Banditaccia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerveteri#mediaviewer/File:Banditaccia1.jpg (these are the most famous ones (Unesco world heritage), but you can also find them occassionally in other, less well known and mostly unvisited necropoles) I have tagged many of them with historic=tomb and tomb=tumulus (and eventually also with building=tumulus) but they can also be considered "mounds". cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
