W dniu 09.07.2014 17:01, Martin Koppenhoefer napisał(a):
+1. These are really two different aspects, because the tagging has the aim to give a short, detailed, precise, specific description of something (and so allows distinction from something different).
And then sometimes you end up with rendering problem because of lack of enough distinction in the tagging (they are by your definition not what they really should be), and what than? I would get back to tagging studio and think if this visual distinction is not a symptom of a more fundamental difference, which should be seen in tagging. And you?
Rendering instead tries to show what might be interesting for a given context (i.e. it will be a selection and generalization of all the information contained in the db). There is only one tagging/mapping db, but there are infinite rendering dbs.
That's true for many "themed" maps, where the context is king, but I talk only about default one. And there are also many wild tags out there (and I don't touch them), but only one "default" set, and it is what I want to talk about. This set is not too big, yet the default map doesn't show all these default tags. I feel it's a bad quirk.
-- Mambałaga _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
