In The Netherlands we more or less have agreement on this scheme <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle_tags_map#Cycleway_tags>for tagging cycleways, cycle streets. I've also noticed this is totally different from the schemes used in Germany and other countries. During the discussion on the proposal use_cycleway <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Bicycle_use_cycleway> (now accepted tag= use_sidepath <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath>) we've seen there are many (legal) differences between countries. There is no agreement on how to tag different kind of cycleways. That's been a reason for me to start tagging the traffic_sign tag on cycleways <http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~peewee32/traffic_sign/traffic_sign.htm>. Once we get to an agreement on how to explicitly tag these we can easily change that based on the traffic_sign tag.
My 2 cents PeeWee32 2014-08-18 22:51 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com>: > > > > 2014-08-18 22:45 GMT+02:00 Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com>: > > You mean the British legal definition of cycleway. >> >> Just to ad another bit of legal aspects in this. In Italy, on ways signed >> like like this >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:120px-Zeichen_240.svg.png, the >> pedestran has priority over he cyclist. >> > > This is true also for Poland, and cyclist may not use road next to route > like this that would lead in the same direction. > And there is a separate name for ways signed like this (ciąg > pieszo-rowerowy). > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Verbeter de wereld. Word mapper voor Openstreetmap <http://www.openstreetmap.org>.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
