2014-08-19 9:11 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com>: > 2014-08-19 8:22 GMT+02:00 Pee Wee <piewi...@gmail.com>: > > In The Netherlands we more or less have agreement on this scheme >> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle_tags_map#Cycleway_tags>for >> tagging cycleways, cycle streets. I've also noticed this is totally >> different from the schemes used in Germany and other countries. During the >> discussion on the proposal use_cycleway >> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Bicycle_use_cycleway> >> (now accepted tag= use_sidepath >> <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath>) we've >> seen there are many (legal) differences between countries. There is no >> agreement on how to tag different kind of cycleways. That's been a reason >> for me to start tagging the traffic_sign tag on cycleways >> <http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~peewee32/traffic_sign/traffic_sign.htm>. >> Once we get to an agreement on how to explicitly tag these we can easily >> change that based on the traffic_sign tag. >> > > It is not so different. Is there some tag used to differentiate between > following situation > - road is one-way direction but not for cyclist, there is a contraflow lane > - road is one-way direction but not for cyclist, there is no contraflow > lane > > According to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway in the first > situation cycleway=opposite_lane > should be used and cycleway=opposite for the second situation. I also use > oneway:bicycle=no in addition > to this two, not instead what I think makes more sense and data is easier > to use. > I also use oneway:bicycle=no.
> > Main difference is usage of cycleway=track, cycleways like that would be > considered as separate in Poland. > > And there is no consideration for cycleways mixed with footways > [highway=path; bicycle=designated; > foot=designated; segregated=yes/no]. > > 2014-08-19 8:22 GMT+02:00 Pee Wee <piewi...@gmail.com>: > > That's been a reason for me to start tagging the traffic_sign tag on >> cycleways >> <http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/%7Epeewee32/traffic_sign/traffic_sign.htm>. >> Once we get to an agreement on how to explicitly tag these we can easily >> change that based on the traffic_sign tag. >> > Can you link proposal on wiki? I am unable to find it. > Maybe not a porposal but a wiki page. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
