Am 13.10.2014 17:15, schrieb Philip Barnes: > On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 17:00 +0200, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: >> 2014-10-13 12:28 GMT+02:00 <p...@trigpoint.me.uk>: >>> I like this proposal too, would it be possible to extend it to >>> tunnels or would that require a similar proposal?
>> Rather a similar proposal, tunnels are more troublesome (see also talk >> page). +1, yes an additional one but linking to this one > There does seem to be a lot about multiple tubes there, I would expect > those to be mapped separately, but would like to see a single tunnel > only where multiple ways pass through the same tube, such as a double > track railway or a canal and towpath. > > The channel tunnel should obviously remain as 3 tunnels. So we use/need it for each tube. The relation is still needed as there is much more infrastructure connected with a tunnel like air conditioning and escape ways/tube. cu fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
