2015-01-15 11:53 GMT+00:00 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>: > > 2015-01-15 12:43 GMT+01:00 Janko Mihelić <jan...@gmail.com>: >> >> With addrN:*=* it's clear that the same place has two addresses. If there >> are two nodes, it seems like there are two places (Two entrances, two >> apartments, two rooms), each with it's own address. AddrN* is clearly >> superior in this aspect. > > you could use polygons (e.g. 2 distinct multipolygons, one for each > address), and add a note to inform your fellow mapping colleagues that the > overlap is intended (note is not needed but nice).
I was thinking about this solution too. The addrN scheme is really quite awkward so it'd be nice to recommend something like simply having two nodes/multipolygons with exactly the same overlapping geometry. However, this gets horrible too: if both of the addresses refer to a pub, should both objects be amenity=pub? (No!) Should they be grouped under a relation which holds amenity=pub other properties? Maybe, but that's getting just as awkward as addrN... It looks like there's a problem to be solved, and none of the solutions is pleasant. Hence I abstain ;) Best Dan _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
