On 10/03/2015, ael <law_ence....@ntlworld.com> wrote: > In passing, I am a little bemused that so many people seem to have missed > the hint that I normally regard tagging for the renderer as evil by > using the word "Blatant" in the title of this thread and that it was > sort of a confession and plea for help on how to avoid doing that.
I don't think that anybody missed the hint, just confirmed that it was just as "evil" and unnecessary in this case. > Anyway, it seems to have been productive overall and it sounds as if the > decision on the "standard" rendering might be revisited. I very much doubt that the decision to not render railway=abandoned is going to be revisited. As for the issue of rendering various cases of "stand-alone" bridges, it was already on the todo. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging