I think it would be better to create separate relations for disputed
territories instead of introducing new roles. Your approach would break
many existing applications.
There's already a proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/DisputedTerritories
Am 21.07.2015 um 16:12 schrieb Eugene Alvin Villar:
My idea is to replace the use of 'inner', 'outer' (and the deprecated
'exclave', and 'enclave') roles in a type=boundary relation with
'defacto' and 'dejure' (or 'claimed') roles. The 'inner' and 'outer'
roles are very trivial to compute (assuming a relation is properly
constructed) and are actually redundant information.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
