On Tue, 01 Sep 2015 12:24:48 +0100
"Dave F." <dave...@madasafish.com> wrote:

> On 01/09/2015 10:59, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:08:34 +0100
> > "Dave F." <dave...@madasafish.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Your suggestion of decreasing the road class is "trolltaging"
> >> Please don't do that. Lane closures or access restrictions etc,
> >> does not change a road's classification.
> > Long-term closure/access restriction is a valid reason to change
> > classification. Lets say that section of primary road is closed
> > making it unusable for transit traffic and is now used only by local
> > residents. This is not temporary change but something for months. It
> > may change classification from highway=primary into
> > highway=residential.
> >
> > Access restriction and lane closure may result in change of road
> > classification.
> >
> 
> No. The classification, usually set by a highway authority, remains
> the same. The temporary signs erected to indicate travel disruption
> never change the roads number/reference, They just say something like
> "The A36 will have lanes closures." & then indicate speed
> restrictions & possible alternative routes.

"classification, usually set by a highway authority, remains the same"
- I am speaking about value of highway tag in OSM, not the official
  classification (in many places these may be the same or strongly
  related - but it is not a strict rule).

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to