Am 03.03.2016 um 11:23 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > 2016-03-02 17:42 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch > <mailto:si...@poole.ch>>: > > While the abandoned proposal seems to be more complete and I can't say > anything about the other variant because of the lacking > documentation, I > don't really care either way, it would simply make easier if we could > come to some consensus on what the actual current state is and > what the > preferred tagging is. > > > > I do care: prefer "kerb" for consistency, as this is Imperial style. > We already had changed the "curb" to "kerb" many years ago, and IMHO > there's no gain in re-introducing the yankee curb.
The problem is "we" didn't. As already pointed out, there is only a proposal that has been bit-rotting for multiple years (it probably, when used on a crossing node, should have kerb:right and kerb:left variants for the asymmetric cases, but that is the only thing I see that might be improved). There's not even a JOSM preset for it. Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
