If you scroll down you will notice that there was never a sloped_kerb proposal as the page is actually the proposal for amenity=sloped_curb which was marked as inactive here http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/sloped_kerb&oldid=670959 (which is understandable given that proposing it as a value of amenity was questionable even at that time and only has 63 uses in total).
In any case it didn't seem to have any bearing on the use of sloped_curb and curb keys which seem to be completely undocumented, but are at least in use (see my original posting). Simon Am 07.03.2016 um 19:39 schrieb Andy Mabbett: > On 2 March 2016 at 16:42, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: >> While the abandoned proposal seems to be more complete and I can't say >> anything about the other variant because of the lacking documentation, I >> don't really care either way, it would simply make easier if we could >> come to some consensus on what the actual current state is and what the >> preferred tagging is. > I notice that two pages have recently been marked as "deprecated", in favour > of: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:kerb > > I find the latter unhelpful; it assumes that all wheelchairs are the > same, and seems to leave no way to say that a kerb is "dropped" (using > whatever term may be preferred), if the editor does not know which > /type/ of dropped kerb it is. > > I would prefer, say: > > kerb=dropped > dropped-kerb=rolled > > instead of, say: > > kerb=rolled > > since the former allows the use of: > > kerb=dropped > > alone. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
