Recently I believe in this case was 2010 . Simon
Am 07.03.2016 um 19:39 schrieb Andy Mabbett: > On 2 March 2016 at 16:42, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: >> While the abandoned proposal seems to be more complete and I can't say >> anything about the other variant because of the lacking documentation, I >> don't really care either way, it would simply make easier if we could >> come to some consensus on what the actual current state is and what the >> preferred tagging is. > I notice that two pages have recently been marked as "deprecated", in favour > of: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:kerb > > I find the latter unhelpful; it assumes that all wheelchairs are the > same, and seems to leave no way to say that a kerb is "dropped" (using > whatever term may be preferred), if the editor does not know which > /type/ of dropped kerb it is. > > I would prefer, say: > > kerb=dropped > dropped-kerb=rolled > > instead of, say: > > kerb=rolled > > since the former allows the use of: > > kerb=dropped > > alone. >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
