In Spain there isn't any cave cadastre. Each speleology club give a name and/or ref to the caves they found in their explaration area. Each club has its own system to name the new caves. So it could be need to specify also the club in the ref? It will be cave:ref:es:CEA=A-111 for a cave explored by the CEA club, cave:ref:es:ECZ=HU-23 for the caves explored by the ECZ club?
Atentamente, Alejandro Suárez On 30 August 2016 at 13:39, Richard <ricoz....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 05:20:19PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > > > > sent from a phone > > > > > Il giorno 29 ago 2016, alle ore 12:24, Richard <ricoz....@gmail.com> > ha scritto: > > > > > > are you saying we should use "cave:ref" just to avoid the use of a > relation? > > > > > > according to the wiki, that's the standard fag to add to a cave entrance > for referring to the cave ref > > added that to the description, the docs still need tweaking. > German cave_entrance description lacks any mention of "cave:ref". > The english says "number in a cave cadastre" which is perhaps > a remnant of French translation and not terribly useful as it > would imply an official registry which may exist only in few > countries. > > So what does cave:ref really mean? Should that say something like > "unique cave identifier"? > Shouldn't cave:ref be subtyped for example as "cave:ref:at" or > "cave:ref:fr" for austrian resp french ids to prevent id clashes? > > Richard > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
