On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 3:50 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Landuse is a tag that is not about what is there - trees, shrubs, flowers, > concrete etc ... but the USE of the area. > > A park is used for relaxation. > A recreation_ground is used for recreation (physical activity). And so on.
So the the land use under discussion is green, diminutive, and decorative yet inaccessible (or inadvisable) -- green median of a dual carriageway, plantings in a roundabout center -- Do we have a term in our taxonomy for that, either in landuse=* or some other, and if not, what should it be? is that the question ? landuse=* may be the wrong tag. Landuse studies normally talk about larger areas than 14m2 ... see [1] "For example a leisure=park tag may be used to describe a park within a landuse=residential area, or for a very large park may be the primary landuse. " the Landuse [1] page decries landuse=grass because it's a cover not a use, but elsewhere [2] it is documented as the appropriate tag for a roundabout center. So yes we have a tag in use, but there are reasons it may be wrong. If plantings are particularly nice, i suppose it could rise to a leisure=garden, garden:[type,style]=*, access=no but the average roundabout or median has a flower box or a mass of perennials, not anything i or the maintainers of [3] would admit was a garden. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landuse [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass [3] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden -- Bill Ricker bill.n1...@gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/n1vux _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging