* John Willis <jo...@mac.com> [170219 09:53]: >> On Feb 19, 2017, at 8:01 AM, Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com> wrote: >> +1 >> Regardless of the "intent" of OSM, this level of tagging does seem excessive >> IMO. I've been following the thread and am amazed that this much attention >> can be focused on developing tagging for washing machines. I guess the >> saying, Your Mileage May Vary, is the operative aphorism LOL
> Although I am personally not so interested in the machines, when the > laundromats are not mapped correctly (google maps and Apple maps was missing > the 4 closest coin laundry places to my residences when I searched so I added > them in both) it is very frustrating. > If someone was looking to wash a giant bedspread or duvet, knowing there is > only one laundromat in town with a giant machine would be very useful. Then we might just tag the things that are useful. How about laundry:oversize_items=yes|no|only ? Wolfgang _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
