Ok,
It is not the easiest way of the World...but it is not the most
complicated. First we think to start of the best aproximation: the REAL
aproximation so:
-If the marks are only marks and not physically separation...don't separate
in different ways...because is not REAL.
-If the way is double direction way you have to tag it with the appropiate
direction scheme. It is not difficult: forward and backward.
-If this road is in this way (with these traffic signs, with these
restrictions, with these road marks...is for a good reason as you say in
the first email)

So we have to tag it precisely.Then ...What we have in Openstreetmap to tag
it?

In OSM you have (without relations) :

-change:lanes= to "draw" the lines (and mark the properties these lines
have, remember there are traffic signs: horizontal traffic signs. In some
countries they have traffic sign code too)
-turn:lanes= to "draw" the arrows (and of course to add the value to each
lane you have
-destination:lanes= to "draw" the destination of each lane because in this
example every lane has its own destination.

Also you know (Hi I'm presenting myself  I'm the crazy traffic sign JOSM
guy - traffic_signs_XX [4] ) I am worried about vertical traffic signs so
with extended traffic sign proposal [5] you can "draw" all the traffic sign
you have in the pics. Sorry, there's no Mapillary or OSC pics (guys c'mon!
;)


Let's start what I would do in:

[1]
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.813784,-73.9338004,3a,75y,27.92h,66.85t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sBwJUpJjqy_IH5HP1SmzcFQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

lanes:forward=3
change:lanes:forward=no|no|no
turn:lanes:forward=through;left|through|trough;right
destination:lanes:forward=| Seward only|

With extended traffic sign proposal there would be two nodes, at the nearly
same position telling:

For one node before the cross:

traffic_signs:forward=US:R3-6
turn:destination=through;right
side=up

For another one node nearly before the cross:

traffic_signs:2:forward=US:R3-5a
destination=Seward Only
side=up

(Note for local traffic engineers. I would change these to traffic signs
with US:R3-8 or US:R-8b [6] , giving the information together I think is
easier to take a decision).

Ok we continue driving

[2]
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.8147778,-73.9331364,3a,75y,26.57h,57.2t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1suJlScKIDzM8Gu0iu2GslFA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

lanes:forward=3
change:lanes:forward=no|no|no
turn:lanes:forward=left|left|right

With extended traffic sign proposal there would be three nodes, at the
nearly same position telling:

For one node before the cross:

traffic_signs:forward=US:R3-5
side=up
turn:destination=right
destination=Union St Only

For another node nearly before the crossing:

traffic_signs:2:forward=US:R3-5
side=up
turn:destination=left
destination=Seward Place Only

For another node nearly before the other ones:

traffic_signs:3:forward=US:R3-5
side=up
turn:destination=left
destination=Union St Only

Ok, and then we will finish our drive with turning left and then...
[3]
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.8153897,-73.9341984,3a,75y,294.27h,81.64t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s7sxU233GvgJ9LBbSAC4_ng!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

lanes:forward=2
change:lanes:forward=no|no
turn:lanes:forward=through|right


Of course If I were a local engineer I would reforce the road marks and
traffic signs with

traffic_signs:forward=US:R3-5
turn:destination=right
destination=Seward Place Only
side=up

For another one node nearly before the cross:

traffic_signs:2:forward=US:R3-5a
side=up

This is How I would map these trips.
I hope it will help you
yopaseopor

PD:

[1]
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.813784,-73.9338004,3a,75y,27.92h,66.85t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sBwJUpJjqy_IH5HP1SmzcFQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
[2]
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.8147778,-73.9331364,3a,75y,26.57h,57.2t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1suJlScKIDzM8Gu0iu2GslFA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
[3]
https://www.google.com/maps/@42.8153897,-73.9341984,3a,75y,294.27h,81.64t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s7sxU233GvgJ9LBbSAC4_ng!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
[4] https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Presets
[5]
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extended_traffic_signs_tagging
[6] https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/pdfs/2009r1r2/part2b.pdf (Page 16)
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to