Although I don't often reply to these threads I am going to give it a go and 
hope to be constructive in the attempt.

If Tom Hardy <rhardy...@gmail.com> you are suggesting that landuse:<some 
adopted code>, I do not think that is that not a good idea. Zoning codes ( in 
the US) are all over the map, so to speak, and have very little if any 
consistency from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The county I live in have seven 
entities that assign zoning codes, and the best I can say about the codes is 
that  R-something implies residential, and C-something implies commercial. The 
code may or may not currently reflect how the land is currently used. The codes 
certainly are not the same as used in Minneapolis. In those parts of the world 
where there are zoning codes and boundaries I suspect there are other sources 
of authoritative geographic data outside of OSM the would be more accurate and 
meaningful sources of information for those that need zoning information.
I also admit I may have misunderstood what you were suggesting.

Ralph Dell

Javbw
> On Apr 18, 2017, at 7:41 AM, Tom Hardy <rhardy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> zoning

Although mapping zoning would be useful, perhaps that is some kind of boundary. 

I am referring to land being taken up by a city hall - the wall or hedges along 
the road, the sign out front that says city hall, the parking, the building, 
the city vehicle parking lot, etc. A lot of these city complexes are a 
singularly named place with several buildings (office, council chamber, tax 
office, etc), some of them quite large - but still on a single land use with a 
name and sign out front and a wall around it. 

The landuse I am referring to is that actual usage - not what it is zoned that 
it could be. In the US, zoning is by type, whereas in Japan it is by scope. 
There are tiny metal stamping shops making brackets for cars next to an 
apartment building, residential houses, a temple, cemetery, corn field, and 
flower shop - all the same zoning because they are all really small, AFAIK. 
This is all within 100m radius.  I would use one landuse polygon for the 
apartment complex, one for the metal stamper, one for the corn field, one for 
the residential house and its yard, one for the flower shop, etc - like tagging 
a school grounds or a park. The building(s) sit in the landuse. 

Not being able to assign a suitable landuse to the land under a tax office, a 
fire station, a community center, a city hall branch, etc is a real hinderance, 
where civic buildings are everywhere, especially compared to their absence in 
suburban America (our fire station is the only one within a 2km radius of my US 
residence; I can easily find 4 or 5 here - they are just so much more 
prevalent. 

Javbw. 
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to