>fire_hydrant: namespace is too >restrictive >regarding>fire_hydrant:water_source>Can't we just use water_source>instead? >Many other devices using>water can take benefit from this. +1
>What is the difference between in_service=no and disused=yes ? +1 I would use disused:emergency=fire_hydrant >:type subkeys aren't so great, and fire_hydrant:coupling:type>can only be >fire_hydrant:coupling (or fire_hydrant:coupling_type>to get more verbosity as >said above) >The same for fire_hydrant:type, can't we use fire_hydrant only>to give the >delivery mechanism ? >The water supply part goes into water_source=*. I don't know about this point. >fire_hydrant:position also exists and it's definitely not a concept >specific to fire hydrants. >position=* or at least location=* can be used. +1 I would use location=*
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
