Le 04. 07. 17 à 17:14, François Lacombe a écrit :
> I still have some comments :
> * fire_hydrant:couplings:type may only be fire_hydrant:couplings without 
> the :type suffix
> * fire_hydrant:type really should be fire_hydrant only. I don't get the 
> benefit of adding :type here (feel free to give me hints)
With fire_hydrant:couplings, you have to guess what this means.
Without reading the wiki, somebody can tag fire_hydrant:couplings=yes or 
fire_hydrant:couplings=2 for exemple.
Sata will be of lower quality
if you want to avoid a generic subname :type, I think that should be
fire_hydrant:couplings_type
the same with for fire_hydrant:couplings_size

Regards,
Marc
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to