Le 04. 07. 17 à 17:14, François Lacombe a écrit : > I still have some comments : > * fire_hydrant:couplings:type may only be fire_hydrant:couplings without > the :type suffix > * fire_hydrant:type really should be fire_hydrant only. I don't get the > benefit of adding :type here (feel free to give me hints) With fire_hydrant:couplings, you have to guess what this means. Without reading the wiki, somebody can tag fire_hydrant:couplings=yes or fire_hydrant:couplings=2 for exemple. Sata will be of lower quality if you want to avoid a generic subname :type, I think that should be fire_hydrant:couplings_type the same with for fire_hydrant:couplings_size
Regards, Marc _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging