On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How about this one then? :-) > > > http://ccheadliner.com/news/world-s-smallest-cathedral- > about-to-close/article_156ea8a8-dbaf-11df-9bd0-001cc4c03286.html > > > A Bishop lived on site & conducted services every day, so it *would* have > been a cathedral (even though it looks like a garden shed!), so I guess it > should be tagged that way? > and our Wiki even has a denomination=old_catholic which would be correct for these schismatics. (Which Wiki entry should, but does not yet, link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Catholic_Church . There are much larger OCC sects than the one with this "cathedral".) > As it's now closed & been de-consecrated, what should it now be tagged as > in OSM - building_yes; historic_church, possibly with start & end dates, > even though it's just in someone's backyard? > building=yes I agree. I wouldn't have called it building=church even while it was consecrated by this minor splinter denomination (165 adherents), since as you say, it's a garden shed used as a chapel and cathedra, not a basilica with a cathedra, with or without transept. (I would have inlcuded amenity for worship, but no longer.) historic_church -- for expansively small values of historic and church, but it does rise to Wikipedia's Notability level. The Building way or point should link either https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Pruter or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ_Catholic_Church_(Pruter) or possibly both.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
