sent from a phone

> On 16. Mar 2018, at 22:47, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I would not expect area where no plant is higher than 50 cm to be
> described as forest. I think that using "landcover=trees" would be
> misleading in this case.



tree is about species, not about age or height 

Would you call a baby “human”?

Cheers,
Martin 
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to