humm ... for me it is only an attraction when in flower. So would need some seasonal tagging with the tourism tag?

Flowers can be part of agriculture - grown for sale in florist shops for example.

On 09/04/18 11:50, Dave Swarthout wrote:
How about
tourism=attraction
attraction=flowers

There are similar areas in Thailand for sunflowers.

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018, 7:29 AM John Willis <jo...@mac.com <mailto:jo...@mac.com>> wrote:

    TL:DR - we need a “flower field” tag or a variant of flowerbed.
     tat is not related to farming, but more to garden or tourism.
    This is a tag for the field itself, not the entire location, which
    may need a garden:type=spectacle value to define it.

    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/flowerbed (yay!
    more landuse= values!)

    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:garden:type

    ~~~~

    I visited a tulip field In Japan yesterday; thousands of people
    coming to take photographs of a field of flowers and the Dutch
    windmill they built.
    http://www.city.sakura.lg.jp/0000000674.html

    This is very similar to the flower fields (and windmill) in
    Calrlsbad, California - the tulips and other flowers grown are a
    spectacle to attract visitors.
    http://www.theflowerfields.com

    It is not a commercial farm which happens to be pretty.  it is a
    carefully planned place to attract tourists to see the flowers as
    a spectacle - like a garden or park.

    I understand that in Holland, those are commercial farms
    (landuse=farmland crop=flowers), the beauty is incidental. But
    people recreate the spectacle on a smaller scale as purely a
    tourist attraction.

    Similarly, Hitachinaka Park has a large hill which they rotate the
    crop of flowers (Nemophila is the most popular) and tens of
    thousands of people come to see the flowers every season.

    I tagged the flower area on the hill a year or so ago - but was
    unsure of how to tag the flowered ground. I left it untagged.
    https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378065849

    Visible here

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/javbw/23417161516/in/dateposted-public/ (
    Fall).
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/javbw/11094010745/in/dateposted-public/ (
    Spring) .

    There are also large fields of colorful shibazakura that are
    planted as a tourist attraction. in many large flower grounds.
    In all these instances, the flower fields are a tourist
    attraction. their primary purpose is similar to a botanical garden
    - they are grown to be viewed - but in a garden/park like atmosphere.

    These images are very popular online, especially the large field
    near Mt Fuji. . https://www.google.co.jp/search?q=shibazakura

    chichibu:
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/javbw/23075345199/in/dateposted-public/

    People may buy some flowers, but it is incidental - people
    primarily come to see them. It’s not flower art - there is no
    “image” grown into the flowers - the flowers themselves are the
    attraction.

    having it tagged as farmland seems wrong. It’s not a crop. It’s
    not a plant nursery. It’s not a botanical garden.

     It’s not a “park” -  the entire location may be a form of
    “garden” tagged as a tourist attraction, but the **field itself**
    needs a tag.

    Flowerbed? seems a little weird to tag 3000m2 as a flowerbed. But
    if it is approved I will use it.

    Suggestions?

    Javbw


    _______________________________________________
    Tagging mailing list
    Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging



_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to