As far as I can tell, for two-way streets, there is no differences, it’s just more explicit.
Given the difference in usage numbers (1522 vs. 254509) I would go with just cycleway=lane (I actually checked these numbers before I made that last post). For one-way streets, I’m not sure how most software is going to interpret it. As it’s somewhat ambiguous, I would say the better solution with a oneway street is to go with an explicit: cycleway:left=lane cycleway:right=lane if one of the two is for traffic against the flow indicated by the oneway tag, use: cycleway:left=opposite_lane (or cycleway:right, depending) oneway:bicycle=no if there is only one cycle lane, but it’s allowed to travel in both directions on an otherwise one-way road use: cycleway:left=opposite (or cycleway:right, depending which side, as seen from the forward direction of the main oneway road the two-way cycle lane is one) oneway:bicycle=no (yes, that isn’t exactly the best value, but that’s what the wiki defines and looking at overpass query results, it seems to be used as such) From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, 14 May 2018 16:38 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [Tagging] tagging of one-way cycle lanes sent from a phone On 14. May 2018, at 08:05, <osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au <mailto:osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au> > <osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au <mailto:osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au> > wrote: So the easiest tagging is: lanes=2 cycleway=lane is there a difference to cycleway:both=lane ? Is the latter for oneway streets with a counterflow lane? cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
