access=disabled sounds much like access=disallowed.
18-05-2018 10:03 tarihinde osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au yazdı: > With emergency and disabled as part of access restrictions, they central > question becomes, are these access tag values (like yes, no, private, > destination, delivery, customers, ...) or transport modes (like foot, > bicycle, motor_vehicle, ...) > > access=no > emergency=yes > > implies that it is a transport mode. > > While: > > vehicle=emergency > foot=yes > > an access tag value. > > Personally, I feel that disabled and emergency sound more like access tag > values (similar to customer, agricultural, forestry) than transport modes. > > But I've now noticed that emergency and disabled ARE actually documented > under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access but as transport modes. > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Andrew Davidson <thesw...@gmail.com> >> Sent: Friday, 18 May 2018 16:24 >> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org >> Subject: Re: [Tagging] access=disabled >> >> On 18/5/18 16:03, Warin wrote: >>> On 18/05/18 15:44, osm.tagg...@thorsten.engler.id.au wrote: >>>> "disabled" is not one of the access types documented on the wiki. >>> "emergency" is not documented either. >>> As there are over 400 uses of it .. I am tempted to document it .. >>> along with emergency - I have used both. >> Why not: >> >> access=no/private/etc >> emergency=yes >> >> there are 28,400 of these, rather than inventing your own? >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
