13. Jun 2018 07:47 by marc.ge...@gmail.com <mailto:marc.ge...@gmail.com>:
> won't work, see e.g. > https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=waasmunster#map=16/51.1215/4.0932&layers=N > > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=waasmunster#map=16/51.1215/4.0932&layers=N> > that's not a forest, that are a lot of private gardens with trees in it. > I opened https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1424854 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1424854> - somebody included also areas without trees. > A forest is a place where you can walk, ride, cycle. Not someones > private backyard. So you want to count tree-covered areas that are not private? (including ones in private backyards). I think that it is not doable with current OSM data (access=private is extremely rarely tagged on private areas) though excluding areas tagged also as landuse=residential may be a good approximation. > Our government talks often about there is so many square meter of > forest in Belgium. > It's not sufficient to subtract all small areas, you need to subtract > somehow everything that is not a forest (see above) So do you want to exclude private forests or something else?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
