Hi, The telecom tagging scheme (on wiki) definitely had a tag for telephone exchanges. For a building without windows, I’d suggest building=service
> 16 сент. 2018 г., в 8:48, José G Moya Y. <josem...@gmail.com> написал(а): > > Hi! > > Path 374362033 ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374362033 ) is a building > with no windows in Calle del Fúcar, 28014 Madrid that contains a phone > exchange (originally it was a gigantic relay system for the phones of the > area, now probably replaced with smaller computers and microcontrollers). > It is tagged as "building=central office", a non-standard tag. > I wonder if tagging it as "building=industrial" would be better, despite of > the whole neigbourhood being officially classified as "tertiary use" > (non-industrial). > > Or maybe "building=yes" would be just enough. Path 28996211 ( > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28996211 ) is a similar phone exchange > building, near Delicias, Madrid, enough old to be announced as "phone booths > that way" on the street. It is tagged as "building=yes". > > Do you think I should change the tag on 374362033? > > Yours, > José Moya > Madrid > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
