On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 08:51, marc marc <marc_marc_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I agree in principle, but I have a few questions. > > Le 09. 10. 18 à 00:32, Graeme Fitzpatrick a écrit : > > man_made=tower: a tall, slim, freestanding vertical structure > > with internal access > > if it matches the look, isn't that what would already be > described by the undocumented building=tower ? > As Francois says, a lattice tower is not a building. & "undocumented" is also a bit of a problem! I didn't even know such a tag existed & it's not listed on the map features page > create a new tower:type=multipurpose > > tower:type=value1;value2 is not enough ? > Could be, but currently man_made:communications_tower renders one way, tower:type=communications & second way & tower:type=observation a different way again. If you combine communications;observation, which would it render as? so all support=pole and man-made=pole need > to be double tagged with the other namespace > or you see a difference between both ? > Another one that I didn't know of the existence of. The only reference I could find to pole was power=pole purely for supporting electrical cables. Somebody else, earlier in this discussion, also made reference to man_made=pole being undocumented but used for roof-top mobile phone antennae Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
