The problem i see with that "multipurpose" value is that it give no information and could be misused for other tower:type (like defensive;observation) which should not be rendered as communication_tower. Thus i would propose to render the "communication_tower" based on the height > 250 m (arbitrary value for example) when in combination with tower:type=communication (even when others tower:type are mentioned like in your example : "tower:type=communication;observation"). I don't know if it is feasible for the renderer to identify the presence of only one value in the tag ? Otherwise i suppose it would need to put all alternative available... :s
Le mar. 9 oct. 2018 à 02:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > On Tue, 9 Oct 2018 at 10:13, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> " If you combine communications;observation, which would it render as?" >> >> It won't render at all, unless an individual renderer adds support for >> this specific combination >> > > Thanks Joseph > > So, if we use the existing rendered =communications_tower icon for my > suggested =multipurpose, that will still render so the massive, visible for > a long distance towers will be easily visible on the map > > Thanks > > Graeme > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging