On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 07:59:22PM +0100, yo paseopor wrote: > One little point > > Untill now GPS navigation is orientative, not compulsory, obligatory or > have-to-do. So instead your Osmand says you go in opposite direction, you > drive, you decide. No kamikaze please.
correct, but it is not our intention to produce data that is better suited for kamikaze drivers than normal users.. is it? > yopaseopor > PD: conditional lanes tagging situation would be interesting with a new tag > (forward/backward/reversible), for example... > > lanes:forward=1 > lanes:backward=1 > lanes:reversible=1 > reversible:forward=Mo-Su 07:00-09:00,15:30-17:30 > reversible:backward=Mo-Su 9:00-15:30 > reversible:closed=Mo-Su 17:30-07:00 Imho conditional restrictions have everything we need, it provides perhaps a little bit more than that and we should pick one preferred method. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions#Evaluation_of_conflicting_restrictions - mentions lanes and directional restrictions explicitly so perhaps lanes=0 lanes:forward:conditional=2 @ (09:00-17:00) lanes:backward:conditional=2 @ (17:01-8:59) I suspect there might be some places already tagged somehow similar like this but can't find them now.. As it has not been implemented in any routers that I know about it might be good to ask in the issue trackers of some routers if they have an idea what would be reasonably easy to implement. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
