The wikipedia page is not a list, it is a description of what a TOP is in Nederland. A wiki page about trailhead tagging is not the right place for that. I think this is within the scope of the wikipedia key. It facilitates one-click access to the wikipedia description from a rendering of the object on a POI map or a search result. If you see wikipedia as a dictionary, the link does not replace it but gives access to it. If other trailheads (non-TOP) would be mapped, they would not get this particular reference.
the website key links to the official website of the operator for a particular region, not all trailheads. The OSM user will find all extra information for the TOPs in that region there. I think that is correct use of the tag. Purpose is the same as with the wikipedia key: quick access. The url key has according to the wiki no specific purpose or limitation. I thought this url could come in handy when using these TOPs for bicycle route planning in Nederland. This site is currently being synchronized with OSM, for Nederland only. I think the use of he key is not wrong, but adding a url of one specific application site for only one of the possible uses of the TOPs is questionnable. I think I will remove this a soon as I am done with the synchronization. Op zo 6 jan. 2019 om 12:15 schreef Tobias Wrede <l...@tobias-wrede.de>: > Am 03.01.2019 um 00:57 schrieb Peter Elderson: > > > About the use of referencing tags. I agree this is not yet the best > result. Wikipedia links to the dutch page for TOP's (as they are called > here), I think that is correct. url links to a site which lists all the > official dutch trailheads. website links to the recreational publishing > sites of different official operators. Each province has its own operator > (and trailhead style). Some of those have a web page for each trailhead, > others have a simple list, others an interactive map or search function... > and they reorganise quite often. Permalinks? What? Never heard of...) so we > don't link deep but refer to a list/search/map/filter page. > > > > Op wo 2 jan. 2019 om 23:43 schreef Tobias Wrede <l...@tobias-wrede.de>: > >> >> As a side note: Looking at the examples I found that you added keys like >> wikipedia=nl:Toeristisch Overstappunt >> url=https://gpsfietsroutesnederland.nl/toeristische-overstappunten/ >> website=https://www.natuurpoorten.nl/ >> <https://gpsfietsroutesnederland.nl/toeristische-overstappunten/website=https://www.natuurpoorten.nl/> >> >> These are all generic references that could be added to the OSM wiki >> page. On the individual trailheads I would expect a website of the >> specific trail. >> > Would you add https://www.government.nl/topics/primary-education to all > amenity=school in the Netherlands? Or > wikipiedia=nl:Lijst_van_hogeronderwijsinstellingen_in_Nederland for all > amenity=university? Or wikipedia=nl:Lijst_van_rivieren_in_Nederland to all > the rivers? Or even wikipedia=nl:Rivier? > > I think the Wikipedia and website links should be very specific to the > individual object and not replace a dictionary. > > Tobias > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Vr gr Peter Elderson
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
