Am 03.01.2019 um 00:57 schrieb Peter Elderson:
About the use of referencing tags. I agree this is not yet the best
result. Wikipedia links to the dutch page for TOP's (as they are
called here), I think that is correct. url links to a site which lists
all the official dutch trailheads. website links to the recreational
publishing sites of different official operators. Each province has
its own operator (and trailhead style). Some of those have a web page
for each trailhead, others have a simple list, others an interactive
map or search function... and they reorganise quite often. Permalinks?
What? Never heard of...) so we don't link deep but refer to a
list/search/map/filter page.
Op wo 2 jan. 2019 om 23:43 schreef Tobias Wrede <l...@tobias-wrede.de
<mailto:l...@tobias-wrede.de>>:
As a side note: Looking at the examples I found that you added
keys like
wikipedia=nl:Toeristisch Overstappunt
url=https://gpsfietsroutesnederland.nl/toeristische-overstappunten/
website=https://www.natuurpoorten.nl/
<https://gpsfietsroutesnederland.nl/toeristische-overstappunten/website=https://www.natuurpoorten.nl/>
These are all generic references that could be added to the OSM wiki
page. On the individual trailheads I would expect a website of the
specific trail.
Would you add https://www.government.nl/topics/primary-education to all
amenity=school in the Netherlands? Or
wikipiedia=nl:Lijst_van_hogeronderwijsinstellingen_in_Nederland for all
amenity=university? Or wikipedia=nl:Lijst_van_rivieren_in_Nederland to
all the rivers? Or even wikipedia=nl:Rivier?
I think the Wikipedia and website links should be very specific to the
individual object and not replace a dictionary.
Tobias
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
