Am 11.01.2019 um 15:45 schrieb Kevin Kenny:
Despite your repeated denials, you're continuing to try to invent a set of definitions that, at least in NL, will encompass all TOPs and nothing else. If that's your aim, then invent a tag for TOP and use it,
That's a good summary I can second. Peter, there are probably a lot of TOPs that are trailheads or where a trailhead is part of them. But there are other TOPs that are not trailheads in the spirit of the original proposal (to my understanding) nor the consensus that has been come up in this discussion. I pointed out a couple of the latter earlier (I did not search for those explicitly they were the first ones that I randomly selected from an overpass turbo query).
I also still stand by my earlier suggestion: Mark the trailheads as such (preferably as a point on a path/track/etc.) with hw=trailhead. Mark the TOPs with a separate node or in some cases better even area and a new key/value pair designating it as such. Several suggestions have been made in this thread (tourism=, leisure=, designation=, ...). If you must, use the same node for hw=trailhead and whatever=TOPorWhatNot but I would advise against that.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
