Currently, 1188 trailheads have a name tag in OSM. A few hundred have no name tag.
Fr gr Peter Elderson Op do 17 jan. 2019 om 01:35 schreef Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com>: > Op 17 jan. 2019 om 01:14 heeft Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com> het > volgende geschreven: > > > > I'd say, by all means you should map the name if the trailhead has a > > specific name that refers to it. Putting the name of the trail, the > > name of the park, or the name of a nearby geographic feature on the > > trailhead node is not the right thing unless that formally names the > > trailhead as well. > > That’s what I mean. The name is not required, but there is one, it’s > important to tag it. (Why? Because it enables searching, listing and > rendering by name) > Trailheads worth mapping tend to have names, see photo gallery, and google > search. It is up to the mappers to decide if it’s worth mapping and > determine what the name is, if any. > If the wording is not clear, can you provide a different wording?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
