Jan 23, 2019, 4:49 AM by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > On 23/01/19 07:37, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> Jan 21, 2019, 12:03 AM by >> 61sundow...@gmail.com >> <mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com>>> : >> >>> The end to this madness is for renders to recognise that the >>> landuse=forest needs to be rendered differently from natural=wood. >>> The essential difference between the two is that landuse must have >>> some human benefit, a produce, and a clear way of doing that is to >>> add the rendering of a axe to the tree. >>> >> >> (1) in a typical rendering this distinction is completely unimportant >> or at least not worth different rendering >> >> (2) other people have different mismatching ideas what is the >> "real" difference between natural=wood and landuse=forest >> >> (3) there is no consistent difference in how natural=wood and >> landuse=forest are used >> by mappers >> > > If the is no difference between the two then there will be no problem > depreciating landuse=forest. > First of all: "there many, many opinions how natural=wood and landuse=forest differ and some people think that his makes distinction between this tags useless" is not the same as "there is no difference". And landuse=forest is used more than three million times https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=forest <https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=forest> > If there is no produce than it is not landuse=forestry. > > Note that many are not using "forestry" to mean "using forest toproduce wood". See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forestry <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forestry> for an example.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
